literature review example dissertation

literature review example dissertation

Literature review example dissertation
To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:
Date published 22 February 2019 by Shona McCombes. Date updated: 9 June 2020

Literature review example dissertation
Now you’re well prepared to start putting fingers to keyboard. Consider the following pointers:
In the summary of your dissertation literature review, it’s important to give a summary of the conclusions you’ve drawn from your readings. If your literature review forms part of a broader research proposal, reiterate the gaps in the literature here, and clearly state how your proposed research will fill these gaps. Make recommendations for future research in this section too, which demonstrates your analytical skills and will score you some extra points.

Literature review example dissertation
Example of a paragraph in a literature review
Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

“The current thesis examines the third way that postevent misinformation may be encountered: through other witnesses. This area has been surprisingly neglected until recently, as the majority of the literature on eyewitness testimony has focussed on the effect of questions and media reports containing misleading information.”
Three sections of the thesis are analysed to show the:

“It has been proposed that attitudes are affected by beliefs and values (47); for the purposes of this review, these psychological constructs are grouped together and referred to collectively as attitudes. Attitudinal questions were included in just over half (53%) of the food safety surveys reviewed. However, a large proportion of these surveys (44%) included only one or two questions relating to attitudes. Such questions usually concerned beliefs about causes of food poisoning, beliefs about favorable providers of information, perceptions of risky foods, beliefs about responsibility, and levels of concern about various aspects of food safety. Very few survey studies actually involved detailed investigations of the role of cognitive elements that may influence important food safety behaviors and specific practices” (Redmond and Griffith, 2003).

  1. Produce a review protocol for the review, with a consultation panel.
  2. Identify keywords, and construct these into search strings.
  3. Select databases.
  4. Analyse identified papers (via their abstracts) and evaluate according to the agreed inclusion/exclusion criteria.
  5. Import selected papers into a reference management database (in this case, Procite). These papers are then subject to a process which he terms “peer review” according to set quality assessment criteria:
    – An explicit account of the theory.
    – Succinct statement of objectives.
    – Clear description of context.
    – Adequately chosen sample.
    – Appropriate data analysis method clearly described.
    – Appropriate interpretation of data.
    – Findings relevant to theory.
  6. Grounded theory was used to synthesize the information, and generate assumptions.