literature review structure

literature review structure

Literature review structure
Structuring work using a methodological approach is quite a common approach, however it’s often used in tandem with other ways of organising sources. This method is particularly evident in introductory sections whereby researchers may simply want to state that a particular subject has been mostly studied from a qualitative or quantitative perspective (they will often then cite a number of scholars or studies to support this claim). In scientific reviews however, a methodological approach may form the basis of the discussions in the body. If this is the case for you, focus on the methods used by various researchers. How did they go about answering a particular research question? Were there any limitations to this method? If so, what method(s) would have been better?
To identify the “gap” it is important that we know what this “gap” is. A research gap is essentially the existence of a research question, perspective or problem that has not been answered in the existing literature on any field of study. Identifying the research gap is important for highlighting the originality of your research; it proves you’re not simply recounting or regurgitating existing research. It also shows that you are very much aware of the status of the literature in your chosen field of study, which in turn, demonstrates the amount of research and effort you have put into your review.

Literature review structure

  1. Critical Thinking:
    You need brainstorming of the ideas that how you will take your research. For example, what type of databases you will use and where you will get your concern research literature.
  2. Reading Different Literatures:
    After making mind of the sources, go for reading different literatures of the concern research subject area.
  3. Draft Selected Researches:
    Afterwards of reading different literatures, draft main and closely related research parts.
  4. Compare and Evaluate:
    Then compare and evaluate those readings. Like, find out the gaps in the already available research and current knowledge.
  5. Formatting:
    Finally, arrange your whole literature in standard format of dissertation writing services. It will increase the readability score as well as reader’s willingness.

If you think that the literature review section of a dissertation is difficult to write, then I must say that you are wrong! If you know how to write an essay, then you can structure a literature review efficiently without any barrier. You may know that an essay has three parts introduction, main body and conclusion. Similarly, literature review’s structure is just like any other essay:

You need to be actively involved in interpreting the literature that you are reviewing, and in explaining that interpretation to the reader, rather than just listing what others have written.

  • “It should be framed by your research questions.
  • It must relate to your study.
  • It must be clear to the reader where it is going: keep signposting along the way.
  • Wherever possible, use original source material rather than summaries or reviews by others.
  • Be in control, not totally deferent to or ‘tossed about by’ previous literature.
  • Be selective. Ask ‘why am I including this?’
  • It is probably best to treat it as a research project in its own right.
  • Engage in a dialogue with the literature, you are not just providing a summary.”

Literature review structure
Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.
Dissertation literature review If the literature review is part of your thesis or dissertation, show how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. Stand-alone literature review If you are writing a stand-alone paper, you can discuss the overall implications of the literature or make suggestions for future research based on the gaps you have identified.

The middle or main body should:
The conclusion should: